Challenges
The process
The Way There
Sources
Load raw data
Transaction data from SAP
Data from additional ERP systems
Excel lists from departments
PROCESSING IN TP MATRIX
Filter, Mapping, and Enrichment
Rules: Filtering & Assignment to Transaction Groups
Quality: automatic reconciliation, correction of posting errors
Enrichment: Combination of multiple sources & levels of detail
Mirroring & manual matching between companies
RESULT
Consistent transaction matrix
Analysis via interactive dashboards
Status management via workflows
Complete logging of all IT processes
Result
TRANSACTION MATRIX · Q4 2025
De-01
fr-02
us-04
sg-09
DE-01
—
100
240
85
FR-02
100
—
62
40
US-04
240
58
—
170
SG-09
85
40
170
—
Voted
Under review
Difference
The consolidated matrix shows at a glance all intercompany transactions — including status and highlighted differences between partner companies.
Manual changes are saved separately — every adjustment remains traceable.
Coordination between companies
Manually or automatically
Both methods of capturing transaction data are processed in parallel and efficiently.
Blocking & comments
Compliance is reliably and transparently safeguarded by lock and comment functions.
Mail & Reporting
Automatic notifications increase team efficiency.
Status & Tasks
Management always has a complete overview.
Voting Dashboard
Q4 · TA-GROUP A
Company A · DE-01
Delivery complete.
€ 240,000
COMPANY B · US-04
2 of 3 mirror transactions reconciled
Difference of €4,200 marked
Reporting & Analysis
Dashboard
›
TP matrix · Q4 2025
Export PDF
Filter
Update
Transaction volume by country
in millions of €
Germany
FR
US
UK
SG
CH
AT
Netherlands
Total volume across 8 jurisdictions · Click a country to filter all reports.
Voting status
347 transactions
62%
Voted
215
Under review
76
Open
56
Active transaction groups
Updated 3 min. ago
TA-Group A · Component delivery DE → US
€ 2.4 million
Aligned
TA-Group B · Service Management DE ↔ FR
€ 0.9 million
Voted
TA-Group C · intra-group license fees
€ 0.6 million
Under review
TA-Group D · Cost Sharing Pool
€1.7 million
Under review
Transactions All charts interactive · Cross-filter enabled · Export as PDF and image
Benefits
Better data quality
Customized overview of group transactions with voting stakes from 30% to 70–80% — and simplified delivery of country-specific transactions.
Faster processes
Shorter processing and coordination times, lower risk through structured and transparent processes.
More concise documentation
Better control over alignment status through management dashboards — with partner-specific reports for direct exchange.
Ongoing compliance
Low error rates in TP documentation thanks to coordinated matrix reports — and higher compliance through transparent, traceable allocation of transactions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which source systems are supported?
TP matrix loads transaction raw data flexibly from SAP, Oracle, and Excel — as well as from other ERP systems via generic interfaces. Data at different levels of detail is combined within the platform.
How is data quality ensured?
How does reconciliation between group companies work?
How does TP matrix transfer data to the TP documentation?
Can TP matrix be combined with other FinAppSuite apps?


